In this paper, turbulent fluid flow is analyzed using a two-equation turbulent finite element model that can calculate values in the viscous sublayer. Implicit integration of the equations is used for determining the fluid velocity, fluid pressure, turbulence, kinetic energy, and dissipation of turbulent kinetic energy. These values are calculated in the finite element nodes for each step of the incremental-iterative procedure. Developed turbulent finite element model, with the customized generation of finite element meshes, is used for calculating complex blood flow problems. Analysis of results shows that a cardiologist can use the proposed tools and methods for investigating the hemodynamic conditions inside the bifurcation of arteries.
Arbogast T, Cowsar L, Wheeler M, Yotov I. Mixed Finite Element Methods on Nonmatching Multiblock Grids. SIAM J Numer Anal. 2000;(4):1295–315.
2.
Bassi F, Crivellini A, Rebay S, Savini M. Discontinuous Galerkin solution of the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes and k-w turbulence model equations. Computers & Fluids. 2005;507–40.
3.
Bassi F, Ghidoni A, Perbellini A, Rebay S, Crivellini A, Franchina N, et al. Computers & Fluids. 2014;54–68.
4.
Bathe K. Finite Element Procedures (2nd ed.). . Klaus-Jurgen Bathe. 2006;
5.
Blagojević M, Nikolić A, Živković M, Stanković G, Živković M. Influence of block’s topologies on endothelial shear stress observed in cfd analysis of artery bifurcation. Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics. 2013;(1):97–104.
6.
Blagojevic M, Nikolic A, Zivkovic M, Zivkovic M, Stankovic G. A novel framework for fluid/structure interaction in rapid subject-specific simulations of blood flow in coronary artery bifurcation. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2014;(3):285–92.
7.
Boussinesq J. Essai sur la théorie des eaux courantes. Mémoires présentés par divers savants à l’Académie des Sciences. 1877;
8.
Materialise NV. B. Mimics software 20.0. 2017;
9.
Conti M, Long C, Marconi M, Berchiolli R, Bazilevs Y, Reali A. Carotid artery hemodynamics before and after stenting: A patient specific CFD study. Computers & Fluids. 2016;62–74.
10.
Ferziger J, Peric M. Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics (3rd ed.). . Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. 2002;
11.
Goubergrits L, Affeld K, Fernandez-Brittoy J, Falcon L. Investigation of geometry and atherosclerosis in the human carotid bifurcations. Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology. 2003;(1):31–48.
12.
James A, Berk G, Charles L. ParaView: An End-User Tool for Large Data Visualization, Visualization Handbook. 2005;
13.
Jovic S, Driver D. Backward-facing step measurements at low reynolds number Reh=5000, NASA Technical Memorandum 108807. 1994;
14.
Kojić M, Filipović N, Stojanović B, Kojić N. Computer Modeling in Bioengineering. . John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, UK. 2008;
15.
Kojić M, Milosevic M, Simic V, Fleming K, Nizzero S, Kojic N, et al. A composite smeared finite element for mass transport in capillary systems and biological tissue. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 2017;413–37.
16.
Kojić M, Slavković R, Živković M, Filipović N, Grujović N, Milosevic M. PAK-finite element program for linear and nonlinear analysis with fluid flow and heat transfer. 2020;
17.
Li Z, Hoagg J, Martin A, Bailey S. Retrospective cost adaptive Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes k-w model for data-driven unsteady turbulent simulations. Journal of Computational Physics. 2018;353–74.
18.
Mcdonough J. Introductory Lectures on Turbulence, Physics, Mathematics and Modeling. Departments of Mechanical Engineering and Mathematics, University of Kentucky. 2007;
19.
Milosevic M, Simic V, Milicevic B, Koay E, Ferrari M, Ziemys A, et al. Correction function for accuracy improvement of the Composite Smeared Finite Element for diffusive transport in biological tissue systems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 2018;97–116.
20.
Nikolić A, Topalović M, Simić V, Filipović N. Turbulent finite element model applied for blood flow calculation in arterial bifurcation. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine. 2021;(9).
21.
Owida A, Do H, Morsi Y. Numerical analysis of coronary artery bypass grafts: An overview. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. 2012;(2):689–705.
22.
Shi Y, Lawford P, Hose R. Review of Zero-D and 1-D Models of Blood Flow in the Cardiovascular System. Biomed Eng. 2011;(33).
23.
Soulis J, Lampri O, Fytanidis D, Giannoglou G. Relative Residence Time and Oscillatory Shear Index of Non-Newtonian Flow Models in Aorta. 2011;
24.
Tomboulides A, Aithal S, Fischer P, Merzari E, Obabko A, Shaver D. A novel numerical treatment of the near-wall regions in the k-w class of RANS models. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow. 2018;186–99.
25.
Weydahl E, Moore J. Dynamic curvature strongly affects wall shear rates in a coronary artery bifurcation model. Journal of Biomechanics. 2001;(9):1189–96.
26.
Wilcox D. Reassessment of the scale-determining equation for advanced turbulence models. AIAA Journal. 1988;(11):1299–310.
27.
Wilcox D. Turbulence Modeling for CFD. . DCW Industries, Inc. 1994;
28.
Wilcox D. Turbulence Modeling for CFD (3rd ed.). La Canada, CA: DCW Industries, Inc. 2006;
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
