The flow on the upper surface of NACA 0015 airfoil is subject to an adverse pressure gradient when the incidence increases. This leads to the boundary layer separation which causes losses in the aerodynamic performances. Control using Vortex Generators (VGs) is a simple passive mean used to delay or eliminate the flow separation from the wall. The two main objectives of the experimental work performed consist in the optimization by experimental design method "DoE" of a new VGs configuration, inspired by Lin's one, by varying its different geometrical parameters. A comparative efficiency study of the two VGs configurations (Lin's VGs, modified VGs) on aerodynamic performances was then undertaken at different Reynolds numbers. In addition to the significant improvement in lift around 22%, the study resulted in a drag reduction of approximately 16% and a stall delay of two degrees. The results were also compared to a three-dimensional numerical simulation (3D-RANS) and showed good agreement. The CFD results highlighted a clear improvement in the momentum thickness along the airfoil’s upper face, particularly a rate of 44.44% at 40% of the chord length.
Ahmad KA, Watterson J, Cole JS, Briggs I. Sub-boundary layer vortex generator control of a separated diffuser flow. 35th AIAA Fluid Dyn Conf Exhib. 2005;4650.
2.
Bak C, Fuglsang P, Johansen J, Antoniou I. Wind Tunnel Tests of the NACA 63-415 and a Modified NACA63-415 Airfoil. 2002;
3.
Bradshaw P. The response of a constant pressure turbulent boundary layer to the sudden application of an adverse pressure gradient. 1969;
4.
Brown C, Nawrocki H, Paley P. Subsonic diffusers designed integrally with vortex generators. J Aircr. 1968;221–9.
5.
Calarese W, Crisler W, Gustafson G. Afterbody drag reduction by vortex generators. Aerospace Sciences Meetings. 1985;
6.
Favier J, Kourta A. Étude du contrôle du décollement sur un profil d’aile par mesures PIV et analyse POD. Comptes Rendus-Mec. 2006;272–8.
7.
Fluent. Fluent 6.2 User’s Guide Fluent inc. 2005;
8.
Fouatih O, Medale M, Imine O, Imine B. Design optimization of the aerodynamic passive flow control on NACA 4415 airfoil using vortex generators. Eur J Mech B/Fluids. 2016;82–96.
9.
Gad-El-Hak M. Flow Control: The Future. J Aircr. 2001;402–18.
10.
Gerasimov A. Modeling Turbulent Flows With FLUENT. 2006;
11.
Godard G, Stanislas M. Control of a decelerating boundary layer. Part 1: Optimization of passive vortex generators. Aerosp Sci Technol. 2006;181–91.
12.
Hares H, Mebarki G, Brioua M, Naoun M. Aerodynamic performances improvement of NACA 4415 profile by passive flow control using vortex generators. Journal of the Serbian Society for Computational Mechanics. 2019;(1):17–38.
13.
Joseph M. Universals in management planning and controlling. Management Review. 1954;748–61.
14.
Kline SJ, Strawn R, Bardina J. Correlation of the detachment of two-dimensional turbulent boundary layers. AIAA J. 1983;68–73.
15.
Koch R. The 80/20 Principle: The secret of achieving more with less: Updated 20th anniversary edition of the productivity and business classic. 2011;
16.
Lin J. Control of turbulent boundary-layer separation using micro-vortex generators. 1999;3404.
17.
Lin J. Review of research on low-profile generators to control boundary-layer separation. Prog Aerosp Sci. 2002;389–420.
18.
Lundstedt T, Seifert E, Abramo L, Thelin B, Nyström A, Pettersen J, et al. Experimental design and optimization. Chemom Intell Lab Syst. 1998;3–40.
19.
Mccormick D. Boundary Layer Separation Control with Directed Synthetic Jets. 2000;519.
20.
Nickerson JD. A study of vortex generators at low Reynolds numbers. AIAA Paper. 1986;155.
21.
Pareto V. Cours d’économie politique. Librairie Droz. 1991;(3).
22.
Prandtl L. Über Flussigkeitsbewegung bei sehr kleiner Reibung. III International Mathematical Congress. Heidelberg, Teubner, Leipzig. :484–91.
23.
Sado G, Sado M. Les plans d’expériences : de l’expérimentation à l’assurance qualité. 2000;
24.
Schlichting H. Boundary-layer theory. 1979;
25.
Steele N, Harding M. The application of rotating cylinders to ship manoeuvring. 1970;
26.
Taguchi G. Taguchi on Robust Technology Development: Bringing Quality Engineering Upstream. ASME Press Series on International Advances in Design Productivity. 1993;
27.
Taylor H. The elimination of diffuser separation by vortex generators. 1947;
28.
Tebbiche H, Boutoudj M. Passive control on the NACA 4412 airfoil and effects on the lift. Design and Modeling of Mechanical Systems -II. 2015;775–81.
29.
Thwaites B. 1987;
30.
Walsh M. Riblets as a Viscous Drag Reduction Technique. AIAA J. 1983;485–6.
31.
Zeng M, Tang L, Lin M, Wang Q. Optimization of heat exchangers with vortexgenerator fin by Taguchi method. Appl Therm Eng. 2010;1775–83.
32.
Zhen T, Zubair M, Ahmad K. Experimental and numerical investigation of the effects of passive vortex generators on Aludra UAV performance. Chinese J Aeronaut. 2011;577–83.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
